Nauka innov. 2015, 11(1):34-39

V.S. Lysenko1, S.O. Yehorov2, D.I. Diatchyk3
1 V.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv,
2 Center of Technology Transfer of the Academy of Technological Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
3 National Transport University, Kyiv


International Experience of the Establishing Technology Transfer Centers at the Universities

Section: Celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the Journal
Language: Ukrainian
Abstract: The analysis of the experience of creation and operation of technology transfer centers on the basis of US universities with the aim of using positive methods for the creation of such centers in Ukraine is presented.
Key words: technology transfer center, technology transfer, innovation, commercialization, scientific and technical activity result.

1. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of April 16, 2014 no.385-p (in Ukrainian).
2. Popp Berman, E. (2012). Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton University Press.
3. Henderson, R M., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M.: University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention. Econom. of Innov. and New Techn., 5, 1, 19–50 (1997).
4. Duderstadt, J. (2005). University-Industry-Government Partnerships for 21st Century Global, Knowledge-Driven Economy: an American Perspective. Report for a Glion V Colloquium, Glion, Switzerland.
5. Science Foundation. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012; available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/; Chapter 5. Academic Research and Development. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/c05.pdf.
6. Ignatov, I.I.: Role of Bayh-Dole Act-1980 in Transfer of Scientific Knowledge and Technologies from American Universities to the Corporate Sector: Results of Thirty-Year Path. Science. Innovation. Education (2012); available at:
http://riep.ru/almanac-science-innovationseducation/11000008/ (in Russian).
7. Thursby, J.G., Jensen, R, and Thursby, M.C.: Objectives, Characteristics, and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities. J. of Techn. Transfer, 26, 59–72 (2001).
8. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L.E., and Link, A.N. Commercial Knowl edge Transfers from Universities to Firms: Improving the Effectiveness of University-Industry Collaboration. J. of High Techn. Manag. Res., 14, 111-133 (2003).
9. Kenney, M. and Goe, W. R.: The Role of Social Embeddedness in Professional Entrepreneurship: a Comparison of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33 (3), 691–707 (2003).
10. Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R.: The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links. Research Policy, 34 (3), 321–342 (2005).
11. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., and Trajtenberg, M. (1994). Numbers Up, Quality Down? Trends in University Patenting, 1965-1992. Stanford University.
12. University of Washington. A Snapshot of 2012: Engagements Metrics, Start-Up Activity, Discoveries, and Financial results; available at: http://depts.washington.edu/uwc4c/about-c4c/fast-facts/.
13. On the State Regulation of Activities in the Sphere of Technology Transfer. Law of Ukraine of 14.09.2006, no. 143-V. Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 40, 2664 (2006) (in Ukrainian).
14. On Higher Education. The Law of Ukraine of 01.07.2014, no. 1556-VII. Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 63, 1728 (2014) (in Ukrainian).
15. National Technology Transfer Network; available at: http://www.nttn.org.ua.